Jump to Navigation
Harrisburg: 717-827-4074 | West Shore: 717-303-3207 | we can help you. call 866-765-0706

Harrisburg Pennsylvania Criminal Law Blog

'Sexting' Statute Declared Void for Vagueness

A trial court in Lehigh County recently declared the Sexual Abuse of Children statute Constitutionally infirm as applied to a juvenile.

By Attorney Elisabeth K.H. Pasqualini, Sex Crimes Defense Attorney, Harrisburg, PA

In re C. S., 2012 Pa. Dist. & Cnty. Dec. LEXIS 403 (Pa. County Ct. 2012) a trial court held it properly dismissed sexual abuse of children (18 Pa.C.S. § 6312) and related charges against a female juvenile because the child pornography statutes as-applied to teenage sexting fail to provide a teenager of ordinary intelligence fair notice of what is prohibited.  The Court found that the statute was "void for vagueness reasons". 

Here, C.S., a juvenile, posted consensual sexual acts of M.T. and L.C. to his Facebook page.  The intent of C.S. was as an expose of L.C.'s activities.  C.S. was prosecuted for sexual abuse of children for having posted such depictions.

The Holding of the Court:

The Court held that the child pornography statutes as-applied to teenage sexting or in this case, teenage Facebook posting, fails to provide a teenager of ordinary intelligence "fair notice" of what is prohibited. It also authorizes or encourages enforcement without proper guidelines or discretion.  A Constitutionally "vague" statute proscribes activity in terms so ambiguous that reasonable persons may differ as to what is actually prohibited.

The Court's rationale:

The world of the new millennium teen suggests that a significant number of them engage in sexting.  The purpose behind the child pornography statutes has little or nothing to do with "sexting".  Section 6312 was enacted "plainly to protect children, end the abuse and exploitation of children, and eradicate the production and supply of child pornography.  A number of scholars and jurists have questioned the wisdom of using laws designed to protect children from abuse by others, to punish a child for their mistake.

If you have been charged with a sex crime or are facing an investigation due to possession of child pornography, you should contact experienced counsel.  You may contact Shaffer & Engle Law Offices, LLC toll free or email us today.

Public Employees May Lose Pension for Malfeasance Committed in Office

The "Public Employee Pension Forfeiture Act" enacted in 1978 defrocks public employees of pension for crimes committed by or through public office.

By Attorney Elisabeth K.H. Pasqualini, Criminal Defense Attorney, Harrisburg, PA

Collateral consequences are those consequences not directly related to a conviction for a crime of whihc the courts have no control over that may affect a defendant's life.  Things such as a driver's license suspension, revocation of a professional license, loss of voting rights, or the loss of a pension are all collateral consequences to a conviction for a crime or a guilty plea (or nolo contendre plea).  See Commonwealth v. Abraham, 58 A.3d 42 (Pa. 2012) (holding counsel not ineffective for failing to advise teacher of loss of pension after pleading guilty to enumerated crime).

We have all been inundated lately with issues surrounding public employees, such as Jerry Sandusky and Justice Joan Orie Melvin's (both state employees at the time of their transgressions) convictions for their respective crimes.  Many have wondered, how can they still keep their lavish pensions after being convicted?  The easy answer, they cannot.  That's because the Public Employees Pension Forefeiture Act, 43 P.S. § 1311, requires that it be forfeited when certain crimes are committed by or through a public official or employee.

What Crimes Require Forfeiture?

The Act provides as follows:

"CRIMES RELATED TO PUBLIC OFFICE OR PUBLIC EMPLOYMENT." Any of the criminal offenses as set forth in the following provisions of Title 18 (Crimes and Offenses) of the Pennsylvania Consolidated Statutes or other enumerated statute when committed by a public official or public employee through his public office or position or when his public employment places him in a position to commit the crime:

  • When the criminal offense is committed by a school employee against a student;
  • Section 3922 (relating to theft by deception) when the criminal
    culpability reaches the level of a misdemeanor of the first degree or
    higher
  • Section 3923 (relating to theft by extortion) when the criminal
    culpability reaches the level of a misdemeanor of the first degree or
    higher
  • Section 3926 (relating to theft of services) when the criminal
    culpability reaches the level of a misdemeanor of the first degree or
    higher
  • Section 3927 (relating to theft by failure to make required disposition
    of funds received) when the criminal culpability reaches the level of a
    misdemeanor of the first degree or higher;
  • Section 4101 (relating to forgery);
  • Section 4104 (relating to tampering with records or identification);
  • Section 4113 (relating to misapplication of entrusted property and
    property of government or financial institutions) when the criminal
    culpability reaches the level of misdemeanor of the second degree;
  • Section 4701 (relating to bribery in official and political matters);
  • Section 4702 (relating to threats and other improper influence in
    official and political matters);
  • Section 4902 (relating to perjury);
  • Section 4903(a) (relating to false swearing);
  • Section 4904 (relating to unsworn falsification to authorities);
  • Section 4906 (relating to false reports to law enforcement
    authorities);
  • Section 4909 (relating to witness or informant taking bribe);
  • Section 4910 (relating to tampering with or fabricating physical
    evidence);
  • Section 4911 (relating to tampering with public records or
    information);
  • Section 4952 (relating to intimidation of witnesses or victims);
  • Section 4953 (relating to retaliation against witness, victim or
    party);
  • Section 5101 (relating to obstructing administration of law or other
    governmental function);
  • Section 5301 (relating to official oppression);
  • Section 5302 (relating to speculating or wagering on official action or
    information).

It is important, as a public employee, to have counsel that is aware of all collateral consequences that may possibly affect one's life.  You may contact Shaffer & Engle Law Offices, LLC toll free or email us today.

SORNA Registration Requirements Held Non-Retroactive

Defendant's obligation to register under SORNA did not derive from the Act itself but from the administrative rule promulgated by the Attorney General.

By Attorney Elisabeth K.H. Pasqualini, SORNA/AWA Attorney, Harrisburg, PA

In an recent decision by the Federal Third Circuit Court of Appeals, the registration requirements for an offender were held not to be retroactive where the U.S. Attorney General failed to provide "good cause" to make an interim rule regarding registration retroactive.  United States v. Reynolds, 710 F.3d 498, 2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 5089, 2013 WL 979058 (March 14, 2013).

Facts as stated by the Court:

In 2001, Reynolds was convicted of sexually assaulting a seven-year-old girl. This conviction required him to register as a sex offender, which he did for the next six years. Meanwhile, Congress passed SORNA in 2006, which required individuals convicted of sex offenses after its enactment to comply with certain registration requirements. Through the promulgation of an administrative rule on February 28, 2007, the Attorney General made SORNA's registration requirements retroactive to those convicted of sex offenses before its enactment-i.e., sexual offenders such as Reynolds.

On September 16, 2007, Reynolds moved to Washington, Pennsylvania. He failed both to update his place of residence and employment information in Missouri and to register as a sex offender in Pennsylvania. Police discovered these registration violations on October 16, 2007, when Reynolds was arrested for violating parole. He was subsequently indicted for violating SORNA's registration requirements because of his failure to register between September 16, 2007 and October 16, 2007. He pleaded guilty, reserving his right to appeal. He was sentenced to eighteen months of imprisonment to be followed by three years of supervised release.

In announcing the rule that SORNA registration requirements would apply to pre-Act offenders, the U.S. Attorney General violated the Administrative Procedures Act (APA) by failing to provide a two month comment period.  The Court determined that none of the exceptions, such as "good cause" applied to the U.S. AG's determination to make the rule immediately effective.  The government, nonetheless, argued that the rule's application was harmless.  In determining whether it was harmless, the Court first had to determine if it was a civil remedy or a criminal remedy being applied.  The Court determined it was criminal.

Here, the Court stated:

The burden shifts in criminal matters because "the Government seeks to deprive an individual of his liberty, thereby providing good reason to require the Government to explain why an error should not upset the trial court's determination." Id.  Here, Reynolds's liberty is at stake.

 Is Retroactivity for a thing of the past?

It is doubtful that the application of this case to other situations will be broad.  This case should be viewed narrowly.  First, the rule may have little application to PA Law.  Unlike SORNA, the Adam Walsh Act specifically defines by law which offenses will be registerable.  Here, the retroactive application of SORNA was determined by the U.S. AG.  In so doing, the U.S. AG violated the APA.  However, there is a notable take away in that the Court held that prejudice accrued to the Reynolds because the government had not met its burden for application to criminal matters.  We have often been reminded that registration requirements are a civil penalty and not a criminal one.  (See links to recent blog articles: Internet Postings of Megan's Law Offenders and Enhancements not viewed as punitive).

For answers to questions or concerns, contact Shaffer & Engle Law Offices, LLC toll free or email us today

The Federal Pardon Process

The Federal pardon process applies only the federal convictions, convictions in the District of Columbia Superior Court, military court-martials.

By Attorney Elisabeth K.H. Pasqualini, Pardons Attorney, Harrisburg, PA

There is a difference between a pardon and an expungement.  (See recent article for explanation).  There is also a difference between a State pardon and a Federal pardon.  Federal pardons may be sought for federal, military court-martial, convictions in the Superior Court of the District of Columbia.  The president cannot pardon a state offense.  That must be done through the state which holds the conviction. 

Unlike the Commonwealth of PA, there is a five (5) year waiting period.  Further, the presidential pardon is only a sign of forgiveness and is granted in recognition of the applicant's acceptance of responsibility.  Unlike PA, it does not operate as a removal of the record from one's criminal history.  It will not erase or expunge the conviction from your record.  It is not a sign of vindication and does not connote or establish innocence.  Finally, there is no hearing on the merits of the Federal pardon application.  In PA, every pardon application is reviewed by the State Board of Pardons.  If granted, a hearing is then heard before the Board.  The Board then decides whether or not to recommend that the pardon be granted to the governor.

"What's the benefit of a Federal pardon if it still appears on my 'record'?"

  • First, it will note that the crime was officially pardoned and, therefore, some of the stigma is reduced for prospective employers, community members, and others.
  • It will restore rights lost as a result of the pardoned offense.
  • Peace of mind.

"What's the benefit of having a lawyer assist me in the pardon application process?"

  • The application rules and submission guidelines are exacting.  For the same reason some individuals do not feel comfortable preparing their own taxes, they have a lawyer handle the matter for them with the Department of Justice.
  • The application itself is over 20 pages and is more rigorous than the State process.
  • If denied, you may re-apply in two (2) years.

If you have be convicted of a federal offense or were the subject of a military court martial, you may be eligible for a presidential pardon.  You may contact the attorneys at Shaffer & Engle Law Offices, LLC toll free or email us today.

"Exigent Circumstances"- A Limited Exception to the Warrant Requirement

The courts must undertake a balancing test to determine if an exigent circumstance trumps the individual's right to unwarranted search and seizure.

By Attorney Elisabeth K.H. Pasqualini, Drug Defense Attorney, Harrisburg, PA

In a recent Pennsylvania Superior Court case, the Court addressed the exception to the warrant requirement of 'exigent circumstances.  Commonwealth v. Johnson, --A.3d-- (April 23, 2013), 2013 WL 1737024.  There, the police received a tip from two anonymous informants that marijuana and prescription pills were being sold at a trailer.  Upon arrival, the police identified one individual as described in the report.  The trailer smelled of burning marijuana.  The officers knocked on the door and were greeted by Johnson.  He told the police he would not consent to their entry into the home.  The police promptly restrained him from re-entering in order to prevent destruction of any evidence, secured the residence of any other persons and applied for a search warrant.

What's an "Exigent Circumstance"?

The Court reviewed the long history of cases on this topic.  Here, the courts are to review the 'totality of the circumstances' in determing if an exigency exists.  Such factors include:

[V]arious factors need to be taken into account to assess the presence of exigent circumstances; for example: (1) the gravity of the offense; (2) whether the suspect is reasonably believed to be armed; (3) whether there is a clear showing of probable cause; (4) whether there is a strong reason to believe that the suspect is within the premises being entered; (5) whether there is a likelihood that the suspect will escape if not swiftly apprehended; (6) whether the entry is peaceable; (7) the timing of the entry; (8) whether there is hot pursuit of a fleeing felon; (9) whether there is a likelihood that evidence will be destroyed if police take the time to obtain a warrant; and (10) whether there is a danger to police or other persons inside or outside of the dwelling to require immediate and swift action.

In assessing these factors, the courts must perform a "balancing test", that is determine whether the exigency of the current circumstance outweighs the individual's 4th Amendment expectation of privacy.  In most instances, police will have a difficult time justifying such an intrusion.  If you have been arrested for possession of marijuana, cocaine, heroin, or another narcotic, contact experienced drug defense counsel at Shaffer & Engle Law Offices, LLC toll free or email us today

False Identification by Minors, "Faking Your Way Through It"

Carrying a false ID is a crime that could land you in jail and cost you your driver's license.

By Attorney Elisabeth K.H. Pasqualini, Criminal Attorney, Harrisburg, PA

I started thinking about minors who use fake IDs when I wrote a blog post a few days ago about a woman who got caught using a stolen driver's license to order a margarita. Ironically, the woman was 26 years old and didn't need a fake or stolen ID to legally purchase alcohol. Nevertheless, that woman is now facing, among other charges, identity theft allegations.

Using a fake ID to purchase alcohol or enter an establishment that serves alcohol is a crime.  The Crimes Code in PA defines it as follows:

18 Pa.C.S. § 6310.3

(a) Offense defined. -- A person commits a summary offense for a first violation and a misdemeanor of the third degree for any subsequent violation if he, being under 21 years of age, possesses an identification card falsely identifying that person by name, age, date of birth or photograph as being 21 years of age or older or obtains or attempts to obtain liquor or malt or brewed beverages by using the identification card of another or by using an identification card that has not been lawfully issued to or in the name of that person who possesses the card.

Keep in mind that if you are caught using a fake ID to purchase alcohol, you could be facing a host of other charges, including loss of your driver's license. Depending on the circumstances of your particular case, underage possession of alcohol, public drunkenness, DUI, and/or disorderly conduct are just a few of the crimes you may be charged with. It is common practice for the police to charge you with as many offenses as possible. This gives the Commonwealth more leverage for bargaining in plea negotiations. Unfortunately, it places defendants in the unpleasant position of dealing with multiple charges for what they thought may have thought were minor transgressions.

There are some harsh consequences to possession of a fake ID. Fines and even jail time are both possibilities. If you are under 18, the police will call your parents. Furthermore, you will lose your driver's license for at least 90 days.

If you have been charged with possession or use of a fake ID, contact an experienced Harrisburg criminal law attorney. An aggressive attorney can challenge the evidence to try to win a dismissal or acquittal of the charges against you or negotiate a favorable plea to reduced charges.

Common injuries caused by Rollover Accidents

Rollovers are one of the most dangerous types of accident on the road. Rollover account for only 2.1% of all accidents but 35% of all deaths caused by roadway accidents. Apart from fatalities victims of rollovers suffer from a greater risk of serious catastrophic injuries when compared to most over types of roadway collisions. Below is a detailed list if some of the most common injuries resulting from SUV, Light Truck and Passenger Van Rollovers. If you have been injured and would like to speak to an attorney regarding your legal right to recovery for you losses call (800) 491-9506.

Head Injuries - Including Traumatic Brain Injury: Brain injuries more common in Rollover accidents than any other type of vehicular collision. It is generally believed that crushed roofs of vehicles are the chief cause of serious injuries to the head in rollover crashes. Traumatic Brain Injuries can result in serious medical health issues costing the injured individual their ability to work, take care of themselves in the home, and maintain close relationships with their family and friends. According to statistics the average lifetime cost of care for brain injury victims can run into the millions of dollars.

Spinal Cord Injury: Similar to Brain Injuries spinal cords damage can result in serious permanent disabilities including, paralysis of the limbs, tetraplegia, and paraplegia. Victims of spinal cord injury often face a host of issues and may require home care, specialty transportation, and other disability need which can cost tens of thousands of dollars each year.

Other Serious Injuries Common in SUV Rollover Accidents:

Severe Facial Lacerations and Facial Disfigurement:

  • Traumatic Eye Injury - Resulting in Blindness
  • Severed Limbs and Amputations
  • Fractured Ribs
  • Internal Bleeding
  • Internal Organ Failure
  • Death Resulting From Rollover Accidents
  • Drowning - often take place when a Vehicle careens of a road in rainy conditions and flips over into a ditch, stream, or river.

Compensation for Your Injuries:

Victims of Rollover accident including single vehicle rollover crashed may be eligible to receive compensation from liable parties including (1) Other Driver (2) Government Entities for Roadway Defects and (3) Auto Manufacturers for the manufacturing of vehicle with a high risk of rollovers.

If you have any questions and would like to speak to a legal representative regarding your right to compensation call (800) 491-9506; Note: All consultations are free of charge.  You may read more at Shaffer & Engle.

 

Tractor Trailer Accidents- Common Causes

Tractor-Trailers (often referred to as semi-trucks) are practically a lifeline to our economy and way of life. Large trucks are responsible for transporting a majority of our goods in the United States. There are numerous guidelines set out by the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA) as well as the Commonwealth of PA to limit the number of tractor-trailer accidents. However, due to cutthroat competition; not every trucking company follows the letter of the law or guidelines handed down by Federal or Pennsylvania Regulators.

1.) Improper load: An improperly loaded truck is far more susceptible to a rollover due to the shift in weight of the cargo. If the weight is not properly distributed through the trailer, the truck is more likely to roll over in a turn or as a result of a quick decisive traffic maneuver. On the other hand, an overloaded truck will have difficulty stopping. Keep in mind that trucks have a much greater stopping distance that a car as a result of weight. As you add additional weight the stopping distance will only increase. In the context of improper loading, the party that loaded the vehicle along with the truck driver will likely share liability. Many trucking carriers will require their drivers to carry excess weight due to profit incentives. Further, we have sadly learned that oftentimes a trucking company will force their drivers to comply with such demands by threatening to use independent truckers. An employed driver does not want to lose his/her benefits from their respective employment. Thus, the trucking company often uses such leverage to get their employed drivers to be complicit in carrying excess loads.

2.) Driver fatigue: Subsection 49 CFR 391.41 of the Code of Federal Regulations outlines a number of rules pertaining to the trucking industry. Much of this subsection relates to rules concerning the amount of hours and consecutive shifts a truck driver may undertake. Further, the PA Motor Vehicle Code spells out the number of hours and manner in which drivers log and report their driving to ensure that truck drivers are alert on our roadways. However, many trucking carriers simply ignore both Federal and PA guidelines in their blind pursuit of profit. We often learn of drivers who work far beyond the allowable amount of consecutive hours. This results in a fatigued and often sleepy driver who becomes a very obvious danger for fellow motorists. Time is money in the world of trucking. Drivers are often stuck at weigh stations for significant amount of time that counts against their allowable driving hours, yet they are not getting paid during such time. In fact many drivers are paid by the mile driven. Thus, there is an incentive for drivers to ignore both Federal and Pennsylvania law concerning the allowable amount of consecutive time operating a tractor-trailer. Section 392.4 of the CFR expressly prohibits the use of amphetamines while on duty operating a truck. It further prohibits any use of alcohol while on duty.

Federal law requires the trucking company to maintain records of duty and all supporting documents on each driver for a period of six months. All drivers must retain a copy of each record and supporting document on driving status for the previous seven (7) consecutive days.

3.) Improper maintenance: In an effort to save money, it is not uncommon for a trucking company to again ignore Federal and Florida guidelines concerning proper maintenance of the tractor-trailer. Brakes, safety lights and reflectors must be checked regularly. A carrier that fails to routinely inspect such items and keep an up to date log on maintenance of the aforementioned items, runs the risk of being liable for a truck accident. There are a number of claims that can be pursued against the trucking company for lack of maintenance such as the failure to install a back up warning system, failure to make use of safe ingress and egress at the top of the tanker and failure to use proper lights and reflectors to illuminate the sides and rear of the tractor-trailer.

4.) Inexperienced or poorly trained driver: At Shaffer & Engle, we are committed to obtaining the driver's employment file as soon as possible to decipher their experience in operating a semi-truck, their employment history including discipline from the employer as well as violations of Federal or Pennsylvania law. Further, we will dig into their past employment history to determine whether the trucking company was negligent in its retention of the driver. Were there any red flags in the driver's past that should have concerned the company?

5.) Speeding: Many truck drivers fail to adhere to posted speed limits due in part to unreasonable demands placed on them by the trucking company that has employed their services. Further, we often learn of truck drivers that will rush through a trip in order to complete their work and be done. Unfortunately, trucks require a much greater stopping distance than an ordinary automobile. When you factor in excessive speed, you can see why a truck driver would experience extreme difficulty in reacting to a sudden traffic maneuver or situation. Excessive speed is a contributing factor to many truck accidents in Pennsylvania. Section 392.6 of the CFR expressly prohibits a trucking company from scheduling runs by a trucker between locations that would clearly require the driver to travel at an excessive speed. Section 392.71 of the CFR bans the use of radars by truckers or commercial vehicle operators.

6.) Drugs/alcohol: Whether it's the solitary lonely nature of the job or the pressures associated with stringent requirements and constant demands, drugs and alcohol related trucking accidents have become far too common. Stimulants ("uppers") are used by truckers to stay awake and alert for extended hours. However, truck drivers often overuse stimulants which creates a very dangerous condition.

I have referenced just a few of the many contributing factors behind semi-truck accidents in Pennsylvania. If you have been physically injured as a result of the negligence exhibited by a tractor-trailer driver or trucking company, call the injury lawyers at Shaffer & Engle for a free consultation and case evaluation.

  1. Improperly Loaded Truck Accidents
  2. Common Factors Behind Florida Motorcycle Accidents
  3. Driver Fatigue: An Inherent Danger of Commercial Trucking
  4. Preparing the Truck Accident Case: Important Items to Consider
  5. Common Spine Injury Related to Automobile and Motorcycle Accidents

 

I've Been Involved in a Car Accident

Guest Blog by Adam Rosenblum, a personal injury lawyer who is admitted to practice in both New York and New Jersey.

Car AccidentIf you have been involved in a car accident and are unsure of what to do, it is important to understand the best course of action to take. Understanding your rights and how to proceed can help ensure that you are given proper compensation and are well on your way to repairing your vehicle or gathering the compensation to purchase another one.

As soon as you are involved in a car accident the first step would be to seek aid by way of calling the police and an ambulance for medical attention if anyone is in need of it. If you find that someone is seriously injured and attempting to move that person would result in further damage, contact emergency services immediately.

As police arrive and begin making an accident report, it is important to remember to never admit fault at the scene of an accident to the other driver, police, or even persons that were in your vehicle at the time the accident occurred. When the police begin the process of filing an accident report, make sure all information is filled out accurately and correctly. You should get the name, license number and other essential information from the other driver involved in the accident.

If the police officer issues you a traffic ticket in connection to your accident, it is important that you seek the advice of an attorney to protect your rights.

How Do I Go About Filing a Claim?

If the accident has left you injured or has resulted in damage to your vehicle or the other person's vehicle, it is important that you file a claim with your insurance company.

Filing a claim is the best way to get legal compensation and help yourself or anyone else involved in the accident get on the path to medical recovery or monetary damages for your vehicle.

As soon as the accident occurs you should exchange insurance information with the other drivers involved. This step is especially important if you were not the one at fault during the accident as you could potentially end up paying a higher deductible fee after an accident. Document any damages that occurred by taking pictures of the accident itself and the surrounding environment. The insurance representative will also take their own set of photos, but pictures will help in explaining your own personal experience in the accident.

Claiming Damages

All states require by law that drivers insure their vehicles in order to legally operate them. This prevents any potential mishaps that might occur when getting into an accident with the other driver not having insurance and covers both yourself and others in your policy from personal injury resulting from an accident. If the other driver does not have insurance, then it is important you call the police to make a report.

Your own insurance policy also helps cover you if the other driver involved in the accident does not have his or her own insurance. If you find yourself struggling to receive a claim for either monetary damage or a personal injury settlement resulting from a car accident, contacting an experienced personal injury attorney will get you well on your way to successfully gaining compensation and reduce an liabilities that you might forced to pay as a result of the negligence of another party.

If you've been involved in an accident and injured, you should not deal directly with an insurance company or agent for the other driver without a lawyer involved.  You may contact Shaffer & Engle Law Offices, LLC toll free or email us today.

What is 'Discovery' in a Criminal Case?

'Discovery' is the disclosure of evidence that will be used against the accused at trial or may be used by the accused to defend themselves.

By Attorney Elisabeth K.H. Pasqualini, Criminal Lawyer, Harrisburg, PA

In Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963), the United State Supreme Court held that a criminal defendant has a constitutional right to obtain evidence that is exculpatory in nature.  Any evidence that tends to show that the accused did not commit the crime(s) charged, must be disclosed by the Commonwealth. To demonstrate a Brady violation, Appellant must show that: (1) the prosecution concealed evidence; (2) which was either exculpatory evidence or impeachment evidence favorable to him; and (3) he was prejudiced by the concealment. To show prejudice, he must demonstrate a "reasonable probability that, had the evidence been disclosed to the defense, the result of the proceeding would have been different." Com v. R. Simpson, 493 CAP (PA Supreme Court, March 26, 2013).

Pennsylvania Rules of Criminal Procedure Provide Guidance

Rule 573 embodies the requirements of Brady:

What's mandatory on the part of the Commonwealth?

  • Any evidence favorable to the accused that is material either to
    guilt or to punishment, and is within the possession or control of the
    attorney for the Commonwealth;
  • Any written confession or inculpatory statement, or the substance
    of any oral confession or inculpatory statement, and the identity of
    the person to whom the confession or inculpatory statement was made
    that is in the possession or control of the attorney for the
    Commonwealth;
  • The defendant's prior criminal record;
  • The circumstances and results of any identification of the
    defendant by voice, photograph, or in-person identification;
  • Any results or reports of scientific tests, expert opinions, and
    written or recorded reports of polygraph examinations or other physical
    or mental examinations of the defendant that are within the possession
    or control of the attorney for the Commonwealth;
  • Any tangible objects, including documents, photographs,
    fingerprints, or other tangible evidence; and
  • The transcripts and recordings of any electronic surveillance, and
    the authority by which the said transcripts and recordings were
    obtained.

What's Discretionary?

  • The names and addresses of eyewitnesses;
  • All written or recorded statements, and substantially verbatim oral statements, of eyewitnesses the Commonwealth intends to call attrial;
  • All written and recorded statements, and substantially verbatim
    oral statements, made by co-defendants, and by co-conspirators or
    accomplices, whether such individuals have been charged or not; and
  • Any other evidence specifically identified by the defendant,
    provided the defendant can additionally establish that its disclosure
    would be in the interests of justice.

If you've been accused or charged with a crime in PA, you should consult with an attorney as soon as possible.  You may contact Shaffer & Engle Law Offices, LLC toll free or email us today.

Subscribe To This Blog's Feed

Avvo | Expert Advice When You Need It Most
Click Avvo logo to view Jeff Engles' Avvo profile

View Elisabeth Pasqualini's Avvo profile Avvo - Rate your Lawyer. Get Free Legal Advice.
View Alexis Miloszewski's Avvo profile Avvo - Rate your Lawyer. Get Free Legal Advice.

Privacy Policy | Law Firm Marketing by FindLaw, a Thomson Reuters business.