Jump to Navigation
we can help you. call 866-765-0706

Harrisburg Pennsylvania Criminal Law Blog

Defending the Arrest Made Using a Drug Dog

Drug dog sniffs are not automatically a reliable means to establish probable cause

By Attorney Elisabeth K.H. Pasqualini, Drug Defense Attorney, Harrisburg, PA

As pointed out in a prior article about canine searches during roadside stops for traffic tickets, drug dogs or K-9's are used by police in many roadside situations.  The K-9's are used to determine if drugs, narcotics, explosives or other illegal or harmful instrumentalities are present.  Police do not require probable cause to conduct a K-9 sniff in PA.  However, they do need a reasonable suspicion.  (See this link to our main site for an explanation of the differences between probable cause and reasonable suspicion).

Many judges rely all too easily on the testimony of a trained K-9 "handler."  Some courts blindly accept the testimony that an affidavit from a "handler" that the K-9 is "trained" or "certified."  Or, even that the K-9 "alerted" to a specific target.  All these ambiguities in the handlers language leave much to be desired when considering the possible intrusions into one's U.S. 4th Amendment Rights and PA Constitution Article 1, Section 9 Rights to searches and seizures.

Here are some possible problems with such testimony:

1) Many handlers provide their dogs with a "reward" for proper alerting to a situation.  So these rewards take some of the dog's objective "alerts" away?

2) Many handlers record "postive alerts" by their K-9's but do not record "false alerts."  This undermines the credibility of the animal's effectiveness.

3) How can a dog differentiate between a current odor or a "residual" or "trace odor" from another source.  Can a dog tell you if the odor is from someone else with narcotics touching the suspect's car door handle?

4) Dog certifications may be in violation of the confrontation clause if the person providing the training are not present at trial to testify. 

5) Dogs may respond to intentional or unintentional "cues" from their handlers.

If you've been stopped for a traffic ticket or your person has been searched because a K-9 alerted to your vehicle/person, you may have a valid basis to suppress the investigatory search, detention and ultimate arrest.  You should speak to qualified drug defense counsel immediately to discuss your options and possible outcomes.  You may call Shaffer & Engle Law Offices, LLC toll free or email us today.

Parole Searches in PA

Parolees have a reduced expectation of privacy in PA.

By Attorney Elisabeth K.H. Pasqualini, Parole Attorney, Harrisburg, PA

Probationers and parolees have limited protections against warrantless or suspicionless searches.  A probationer's home can be searched by a probation officer without a warrant if "reasonable grounds" exist to support the search.  Where a probationer agrees to be the subject of a search, the case law has uniformly held that reasonable suspicion exists. 

However, the search must be reasonably related to the purpose for which the probationer is on supervision.  For instance, where a search conducted by a parole agent was for drugs, but the suspected violation was for a recent arrest, the search was not permissible.  Suppression may be a viable option for state parolees.  Further, police may not simply "tag along" on parole searches.  The police still have a probable cause standard for conducting warrantless searches and may not use the parole agents as a "stalking horse" to gain access to a parolee's residence.

If you are on probation or parole and have been subjected to a search of your person, car, or home and evidence has been seized, you should contact an experienced attorney before your next court date.  You may contact the attorneys at Shaffer & Engle Law Offices, LLC toll free or email us today.

Driving without a Valid License in PA

Section 1501(a) of the Pennsylvania Motor Vehicle Code provides for the six month suspension of one's license if it's a second offense within 5 years.

By Attorney Elisabeth K.H. Pasqualini, Traffic Ticket Lawyer, Harrisburg, PA

Section 1501 of the PA Motor Vehicle Code is an often-cited provision of the Motor Vehicle Code.  An offense is committed if one "shall drive any motor vehicle upon a highway or public property in this Commonwealth unless the person has a driver's license valid under the provisions of this chapter."  An officer or your attorney may sometimes seek to replace this section for a 1543(a) or (b), which is driving while your license is suspended for a DUI or otherwise.  The penalty for a violation of 1543 is a one year license suspension. 

However, getting a 1501 as a citation is not always a favor if you've gotten cited within the last 5 years for this section.  Section 1501 provides as follows:

The department shall suspend the operating privilege of any driver for six months upon receiving a certified record of the driver's conviction of a subsequent offense under section 1501(a) (relating to drivers required to be licensed) if the prior offense occurred within five years of the violation date of the subsequent offense.

You should always speak to an attorney before you enter a guilty plea to a traffic citation.  This is because the points and possible suspension period is not listed on the citation.  The officer usually doesn't know or expect that you will lose your license for some offenses as well.  If you are an out-of-state driver, your home state may provide for different penalties as well.  Contact an experienced traffic ticket attorney at Shaffer & Engle Law Offices, LLC toll free or email us today.

Confessions of the Accused

A confession must be made knowingly, voluntarily and of a suspect's own free will to be valid.

By Attorney Elisabeth K.H. Pasqualini, Constitutional Rights Lawyer, Harrisburg, PA

During custodial interrogation or an arrest, an accused has a right to remain silent unless he or she chooses to speak in the unfettered exercise of his or her own will.  The waiver of this right must be both knowing and voluntary.

What's meant by a "knowing waiver?"

A knowing waiver requires that the accused know his or her rights before choosing to waive them.  The accused must have been apprised of his or her Miranda rights and understood them before they can waive them.   

What's meant by "voluntary?"

Although there is no single test for determining the voluntariness of a confession, it must be established that the decision to speak was the product of a free and unconstrained choice of its maker.  All of the attending facts and circumstances must be evaluated to determine if the confession was voluntarily made.  Although there is no single litmus-paper test to determining the voluntariness of a confession, it must be established that the decision to speak was a product of a free and unconstrained choice of its maker. The courts will examine the duration and methods of interrogation, the length of delay between arrest and arraignment, the conditions of detainment, the attitudes of the police toward the defendant, the defendant's physical and psychological state, and all other conditions present which may serve to drain one's power of resistance to suggestion or to undermine one's self-determination.

The question of the voluntariness of a confession is not whether a defendant would have confessed without interrogation, but whether the interrogation was so manipulative or coercive that it deprived the defendant of his or her ability to make a free and unconstrained decision to confess.

What's the remedy if the confession was made in violation of my rights?

The statement made to the police may be suppressed or kept from evidence during the Commonwealth's case in chief.  This means they cannot use the statement or anything derived from it, such as the location of a weapon.  But, it does not necessarily mean that the charges get dismissed.

If you've been arrested or charged with a crime and there's been a statement given to the police by you, you need to contact an experienced criminal attorney as soon as possible.  You may contact Shaffer & Engle Law Offices, LLC toll free or email us today.

Consent to Search- An Exception to the Warrant Requirement

Consent to search is an exception to the warrant requirement, but it must be knowing, intelligent and voluntary to be valid

By Attorney Elisabeth K.H. Pasqualini, Constitutional Rights Lawyer, Harrisburg, PA

I have written several blog articles about police stops along roadways and the Constitutional requirements placed on police if they desire to search your car.  (See Blog link).  One of those exceptions to obtaining a warrant is the consent of the driver or some other person with a legitimate expectation of privacy in the place or thing to be searched.  This article explores in greater detail what is meant by 'consent.'

A person may refuse to consent and evidence of the refusal is not admissible

Neither the United States Constitution nor the Pennsylvania Constitution precludes a warrantless search of property when consent is given by a person possessing the authority to consent to the search.  Furthermore, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court has held that the greater privacy rights afforded by the Pennsylvania Constitution are sufficiently protected when the federal standard of voluntariness has been met.  A person may refuse to consent, and evidence of the refusal is not admissible. 

The police may not coerce you, consent must be knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily given.

In Bumper v. North Carolina, the United States Supreme Court held that when a prosecutor seeks to rely upon consent to justify the lawfulness of a search, the prosecutor has the burden of proving that the consent was, in fact, freely and voluntarily given.  Mere acquiescence to a claim of lawful authority is insufficient. The consent must be knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily given. 

There is no obligation on police to advise you that you have a right NOT to consent, so don't be fooled into thinking you do.

A person need not be informed of the right to refuse consent to a warrantless search in order for the consent to be found voluntary, but such knowledge will be considered when assessing the totality of the circumstances surrounding the search. 

The courts look at the following factors to determine if you consent was voluntary and not coerced.

The following factors favor a finding that consent was voluntary:

  1. The defendant's background indicates his understanding of investigating procedures or his understanding of constitutional rights;
  2. The suspect has aided an investigation or search;
  3. The consenter believed the evidence to be so well concealed that it probably would not be found;
  4. The fact of some prior cooperation by the consenter which produced no incriminating evidence;
  5. The suspect felt that the best course of conduct was cooperation given that he was caught "red-handed";
  6. The presence of probable cause to arrest or search the suspect.

But, the following factors would work against a finding that the consent was voluntary; ie, NOT voluntary:

  1. The defendant was interrogated numerous times while in custody over a period of hours;
  2. The police used express or implied threats to obtain consent;
  3. The defendant acquiesced to an order, suggestion, or request of the police; and
  4. The police lacked probable cause to arrest or search the subject.

If you've been stopped or arrested by the police, be cooperative and courteous.  But, do not consent to a search of your car, home, containers, luggage or other items not on your person.  The police will try to get you to consent.  It's the easiest way for them to obtain evidence.  Do not make it easy on them.  Contact an experienced criminal law attorney.  You may contact Shaffer & Engle Law Offices, LLC toll free or email us today.

Speeding Penalties and Workzones

There are points for speeding and suspensions for exceeding the maximum speed limit in workzones.

stock photo : a motorcycle police officer aiming his radar gun a traffic.

By Attorney Elisabeth K.H. Pasqualini, Traffic Ticket Attorney, Harrisburg, PA

With summer comes roadwork- they go together like hotdogs and baseball.  Folks traveling to work and to vacation hot spots will undoubtedly come into contact with the ubiquitous flashing orange cones that stand guard along the highways of PA.  However, there are special penalties that also come with speeding in work zones.

The typical speeding penalties under the PA Motor Vehicle Code carry points as follows:


 

MPH over LIMIT                POINTS

6-10                                        2

11-15                                      3

16-25                                      4

26-30                                      5

31-over                                   5  (and a departmental hearing and sanctions)


But, did you also know that there are suspensions as well?  Here, the Vehicle Code provides:

Suspension of operating privilege.--In addition to other provisions othis title relating to the suspension or revocation of operating privileges, the department shall suspend for 15 days the operating privileges of any person who for a violation in an active work zone is convicted under:

  1. Section 3361 where the department has received an accident report submitted pursuant to Section 3751 (relating to reports by police); or
  2. Section 3362 (relating to maximum speed limits) by exceeding the posted speed limit by 11 miles per hour or more. A conviction report received by the department which indicates that the violation of section 3361 or 3362 occurred in an active work zone shall create a presumption that the violation occurred in an active work zone.

If you've been ticketed for speeding in PA along a major route that was "under construction" at the time, do not simply plead guilty.  You could be setting yourself up for a 15 day license suspension.  Also, don't think that because you are an out-of-state driver that the points or suspension won't follow you.  It can and it usually will.  Call an experienced traffic attorney first at Shaffer & Engle Law Offices, LLC toll free or email us today.

 

 

Police Use Drug Courier Profiling in War Against Drugs

A drug courier profile is not per se unreasonable

Police : a police officer standing in the night during a patrol shift.

By Attorney Elisabeth K.H. Pasqualini, Drug Defense Attorney, Harrisburg, PA

Drug courier profiles present special problems for the courts. A drug courier profile is not per se unreasonable, but the officer must still observe unusual and suspicious conduct on the part of the individual seized which leads the officer reasonably to conclude that criminal activity may be afoot.

The danger inherent in defining reasonable suspicion in the context of a drug courier profile is that the police officer's suspicion is not aroused by personal observation of an individual whose behavior sets him apart from other travelers. As a result, a drug courier profile should serve only as a starting point, and not as a substitute for independent observation of an individual's behavior.

For example

When an investigative detention was based on the agent's reasonable suspicion that criminal activity was afoot, and the search of the defendant's bag occurred during the course of the investigative detention, the court properly refused to suppress the evidence seized.

When police assert that their initial suspicion of a person is based on a certain drug courier profile, they must introduce the complete and proven profile if they wish to rely on it to justify an investigatory stop.

If you've been stopped and arrested by police because you believe that you fit a certain 'profile', it's important to speak to counsel immediately to discuss the possiblity that your rights were violated.  The evidence discovered may be suppressed.  You may contact Shaffer & Engle Law Offices, LLC toll free or email us today.

Narcotics and Penalties in PA

Drug trafficking penalties in PA are severe, but first, we must know which drugs fall into which schedules.

By Attorney Elisabeth K.H. Pasqualini, Drug Defense Lawyer, Harrisburg, PA

There are severe penalties for possession with the intent to distribute ("PWI") illegal narcotics in PA.  These penalties vary depending on what 'Schedule' the drug falls into under the PA Drug Act.

Schedule I. In determining that a substance comes within this schedule, there is a high potential for abuse, no currently accepted medical use in the United States, and a lack of accepted safety for use under medical supervision. The following controlled substances are included in this schedule:

  1. Opiates,
  2. Opium derivatives, such as: Acetyldihydrocodeine, Benzylmorphine, Codeine, Heroin, Morphine.
  3. A material, compound, mixture or preparation which contains any quantity of the following hallucinogenic substances: Mescaline, Peyote, "Marihuana" or Marijuana.

Schedule II. In determining that a substance comes within this schedule, there is a high potential for abuse, currently accepted medical use in the United States or currently accepted medical use with severe restrictions and abuse may lead to severe psychic or physical dependence. The following controlled substances are included in this schedule:

(1) The following substances of any quantity, except those narcotics specifically excepted or listed in other schedules, whether produced directly or indirectly by extraction from substances of vegetable origin, or independently by means of chemical synthesis, or by combination of extraction and chemical synthesis:

  • Opium and opiate, and a salt, compound, derivative or preparation of opium or opiate.
  • Opium poppy and poppy straw.
  • Coca leaves (Cocaine) and a salt, compound, derivative or preparation of coca leaves.
  • Phencyclidine, Pentobarbital 

Schedule III. In determining that a substance comes within this schedule, there is a potential for abuse less than the substances listed in Schedules I and II.  There is well documented and currently accepted medical use in the United States and abuse may lead to moderate or low physical dependence. The following classes of controlled substances are included in this schedule:

  1. A substance which contains any quantity of a derivative of barbituric acid, or a salt of a derivative of barbituric acid.
  2. A material, compound, mixture, or preparation containing limited quantities of codeine or opium.

Schedule IV. In determining that a substance comes within this schedule, there is a low potential for abuse, currently accepted medical use in the United States and limited physical or psychological dependence liability.  Examples include: Temazepam and Lorazepam.

Schedule V. In determining that a substance comes within this schedule, there is a low potential for abuse relative to the substances listed in Schedule IV; currently accepted medical use in the United States; and limited physical dependence or psychological dependence liability relative to the substances listed in Schedule IV.  Examples include:  Propylhexadrine and Pyrovalerone.

Penalties Associated with the Schedules:

  • Schedule I or II drugs: A fine of up to $250,000 and up to 15 years in prison
  • Schedule I, II, or III drugs: A fine of up to $15,000 and up to 5 years in prison
  • Schedule IV drug: A fine of up to $10,000 and up to 3 years in prison
  • Schedule V drug: A fine of up to $1,000 and up to 1 year in prison

'Enhancements' may apply

In cases where illegal drugs are sold within a school zone or are sold to a minor or person under 21 years of age, penalties may double or triple.  Mandatory sentencing may also apply based upon quantity sold and the possession of a firearm.  Further, penalties may be doubled if there is a prior conviction at the time of sentencing.

If you've been charged with drug possession or delivery, you should contact an experienced drug trafficking lawyer.  You may contact Shaffer & Engle Law Offices, LLC toll free or email us today.

Drug Trafficking Offenses Committed with a Firearm

The possession of a firearm at the time of the commission of a drug transaction has a five year mandatory minimum.

By Attorney Elisabeth K.H. Pasqualini, Drug Defense Lawyer, Harrisburg, PA

Any person convicted of a violation of § 13(a)(30) of The Controlled Substance, Drug, Device and Cosmetic Act, when, at the time of the offense, the person or the person's accomplice was in physical possession or control of a firearm, whether visible, concealed about the person or the person's accomplice, or within the actor's or accomplice's reach or in close proximity to the controlled substance, is subject to a five-year mandatory minimum sentence.

What's meant by a "firearm?"

As used in § 9712, "firearm" means any weapon (including a starter gun or BB gun), which will, is designed to, or may readily be converted to, expel a projectile by the action of an explosive or the expansion of gas therein.  It is irrelevant that the firearm is inoperable, as long as it was designed to function in a manner that meets the definition.  "Visibly possessed" means possession which manifests itself in the process of a crime, even when the item possessed is hidden from view.

It does not matter that you were legally licensed to carry the weapon.

In a recent decision in February 2012, the Superior Court held in Stein, that despite the firearm not being used in the commission of the delivery and being legally licensed to the accused, the five year mandatory did still nonetheless apply.

If you've been arrested or charged with a drug delivery or drug trafficking offense, you need to speak to experienced drug defense counsel.  You may contact Shaffer & Engle Law Offices, LLC toll free or email us today.

Mental Insanity as a Defense

To plead the defense of insanity suggests that the defendant committed the act, but was not legally culpable.

By Attorney Elisabeth K.H. Pasqualini, Criminal Homicide Attorney, Harrisburg, PA

Insanity is a defense to homicide or murder in PA.  Legal insanity is grounds for complete acquittal in Pennsylvania.  The defendant bears the initial burden of proving the affirmative defense of legal insanity.  The verdict of "not guilty by reason of insanity" means that the defendant did commit the act, but because of his mental illness he cannot be legally responsible.  In other words, a defense of insanity acknowledges commission of the act by the defendant, while maintaining the absence of legal culpability.  The test of legal insanity is not whether the defendant was mentally ill from a medical viewpoint, but whether the defendant knew what he was doing and knew that it was wrong.

For example:

Testimony which suggested that the defendant purposefully committed the criminal acts in a secluded spot, that he purposefully fled from the scene when a car approached, that he attempted to destroy evidence and to disguise his appearance, and that he knew that he had killed someone, and that it was wrong to do so, was sufficient to rebut the defendant's insanity defense.

If you've been charged with murder and believe that a defense of legal insanity may apply, you need to speak with experienced legal counsel.  You will need to be examined by a medical expert to determine if your defense is valid.  You may contact Shaffer & Engle Law Offices, LLC toll free or email us today.

Subscribe To This Blog's Feed

Avvo | Expert Advice When You Need It Most
Click Avvo logo to view Jeff Engles' Avvo profile

View Elisabeth Pasqualini's Avvo profile Avvo - Rate your Lawyer. Get Free Legal Advice.
View Alexis Miloszewski's Avvo profile Avvo - Rate your Lawyer. Get Free Legal Advice.

Privacy Policy | Legal Marketing by FindLaw, a Thomson Reuters business.